This report substantiates what we already know; video use is exploding on the Internet. Pew does their usual outstanding job of documenting changes in Internet use.
But what does it mean for those of us in government, associations and nonprofits?
It means that creating products via video is easier than ever with small video cameras containing a separate plug-in port for an audio mike. They are cheaper than ever with some close to $100.00. Most shoot in high-definition.
Note that good audio is the essence of good video. No, your video camera on your smartphone won’t do; it doesn’t contain a port for a separate audio channel.
By adding a tripod and getting decent lighting (natural light is preferred) and using editing tools (if necessary) that come with Mac products or inexpensive PC-based tools, it’s more than feasible to add video to your website product mix. YouTube wil be more than happy to host your product for free.
Note that there are some public access television stations that will create full productions for several hundred dollars an episode.
For those of us trying to reach non-whites and parents, the data indicates that video is a must-have option.
The Pew report: (http://pewresearch.org/pubs/2070/online-video-sharing-sites-you-tube-vim).
71% of Online Adults Now Use Video-Sharing Sites—Pew Internet.Org
July 26, 2011
More online Americans are using video-sharing sites– and they are doing so more frequently. As of May 2011, 71% of online adults reported watching videos on a video-sharing site such as YouTube or Vimeo.
That represents a five-percentage-point increase from the 66% of online adults who reported being video-sharing site users a year earlier and a 38-point increase from five years ago when the Pew Internet Project took its first reading on use of such sites.
Moreover, the use of video-sharing sites on any given day also jumped five percentage points. In our May 2001 survey, 28% of online Americans said they had gone to such sites “yesterday,” compared with 23% who had reported using video-sharing sites “yesterday” — or on a typical day in May 2010.
Rural internet users are now just as likely as urban and suburban users to have sampled video at video-sharing sites
Rural internet users are now just as likely as users in urban and suburban areas to have used these sites. Some 68% of rural internet users have gone to such sites, compared with 71% of online suburbanites and 72% of online urban residents. Those are statistically insignificant differences and show that since 2009, online rural residents have caught up to others in using these sites.
At the same time, rural internet users are still less likely to be visiting video-sharing sites on a typical day (14% vs. 31% and 33% for suburban and urban residents, respective
Non-whites are more likely to use video-sharing sites
Another notable and persistent trend is that non-white adult internet users have higher rates of video-sharing site use than their white counterparts, a consistent finding since 2006.
Overall, 69% of white internet users said they had visited video-sharing sites, 13 points higher than in April 2009, and more than double the 31% reported when the question was first asked in December 2006.2 At the same time, 79% of online non-whites — African-Americans, Hispanics and others — reported using video-sharing sites. That figure is 12 points higher than April 2009, and 41 points higher than in 2006.
Parents use video-sharing sites more than non-parents
Some 81% of parents in the survey reported visiting video-sharing sites, compared with 61% of the non-parents. Parental use increased nine points from 72% in May 2010, while non-parental use dipped slightly from the 63% reported in the same survey.3 This increase might also be attributable to the fact that parents with minors at home are younger as a group than the non-parents cohort and use of video-sharing sites is linked to younger users.
Higher use of video-sharing sites coincides with the explosion of content on YouTube, including videos produced by amateurs
The rise in use of video-sharing sites is at least partly being driven by the growth in content on sites like YouTube and by user contributions. The rise in use of video-sharing sites is at least partly being driven by the growth in content on sites like YouTube and by user contributions, which then possibly encourage site visits by contributors’ friends and others who pass around links about popular amateur videos.
The latest statistics from YouTube are that 48 hours of content are uploaded every minute to the site and the range of contributions is striking. YouTube lists 28 different categories for channels of video that are contributed and dozens of subcategories ranging from automobiles and gaming, to activism and politics.